Nikola Kalinic (from behind), Fiorentina striker, with mate Milan Badelj. Getty
Decision Gazette – For Rosea the goal is to be attributed to Kalinic. Her touch is in fact clear and decisive, because it prevents Karnezis to take action on the ball safely. And the voluntariness? We turn the question: anyone would dream of giving the first goal of the 2006-07 Champions League final to Pirlo and Inzaghi? Yet the touch of Pippo was completely unintentional, since the AC Milan striker had turned his back on the punishment of the partner. But it was his detour to displace Reina, just like that of Kalinic has today put out time Karnezis. Journal maintains the same logic of the UEFA of those years. Obviously it would be different if the touch had been a defender of Udinese. In that case, it would reward those who still pulls and attacks, that Badelj. But Kalinic attacks just like Badelj, so why consider it neutral, since his departure, however, is clear and decisive?
alloy series – For five seasons now, the A League has changed its rules, so the authorship of the first goal is purple Badelj and not of Kalinic. The dividing line is that the shot Badelj was headed on target and that the touch of the Croatian was not voluntary. Legitimate choice, but journal remains faithful to its line for this season. The deviation of a striker, if the net and even more decisive, involves the assignment of goals to those who deflected shot mate.
No comments:
Post a Comment