Mauro Icardi, 22, on the bench against Genoa. LaPresse
Bad to whom? The results have never been lacking, but the refrain of the annoying “can not go on all year in shots 1-0 lucky” accompanied the excellent way Inter so far. But from Naples, and even more tonight against Genoa, Mancini’s team has raised a lot of the level of their game. It ‘s the eighth 1-0 season, which in common with the other has only the result. Why ever approached another Inter, more than ever able to race for the title until May.
THE TURNING – Inter Napoli, that in 10 in the second half put the ropes Napoli in the final and nearly earned resounding 2-2 with two poles in the recovery, had convinced everyone. And against Genoa, get a 1-0 that does not do about the gap that is seen in the field. A brilliant team, who play one or two touches in speed, it opens the field on the wings and creates a great deal. Giving little and nothing.
IF ICARDI? – have in common the formations deployed in the second half at St. Paul and with Genoa? There was Mauro Icardi, top scorer last year. No one disputes the value of the player, that is absolute. How striker born in ’93 are in the world with his ability to score goals? Icardi is a killer of the penalty area, which holds up to 22 years all kinds of pressure. This year marks less (4 goals in 12 appearances) and Mancini has repeatedly stressed that should improve in the game with his friends. Before he prodded, then she puts him off the team. Even for a coexistence problem with Jovetic: the two have played together since only one of their last six games. With Genoa not included it in the field, even when shooting in the Montenegrin requested the change. The Inter coach prefers a more center-maneuvering, that does not give references and that does not limit its impact to the penalty area. One as Rodrigo Palacio tonight, strong in the riverside. Courageous choice. And so far winning: with the Argentine in the field maneuver seldom been so bright.
LITTLE CONCRETE – But, in football as in life, there is the perfect choice, which does not carry any negative consequence. The rest would be absurd to think of leaving out only improve what remains a great striker. There is not only the risk, clearly, to devalue a company’s assets. Inter vs. Genoa missed too many goals, not only for parades of Perin. With Ljajic, however, the best in the field, and Jovetic. There is no rebuttal, but there is reason to suspect that Icardi one of those balls would have thrown the net. What to choose then? The terminal that concrete his companions but it makes you play worse or the quality of the game? Mancini weight of the decision. That the King of the Mountain of the top spot is a bit ‘less burdensome.
No comments:
Post a Comment