Inter throwing away the chance & agrave; to return to the home victory and is punished by the goal of Lasagna at 92 ‘. A draw even “stolen” by the Carpi, but wasted Inter & egrave; under the eyes of all: they weigh the choices of Mancini, especially in the final game. Accused whole team [& hellip;]
->
Inter throwing away the chance to return to the home victory and is punished by the goal of Lasagna at 92 ‘. A draw even “stolen” by the Carpi, but wasted Inter is plain for all: they weigh the choices of Mancini, especially in the final game. Impeach the whole team for the collective sleep
EDUCATION – This is the starting eleven chosen from Roberto Mancini to address the Carpi: Handanovic; Montoya, Murillo, Juan Jesus, Telles; Melo, Brozovic; Perisic, Palacio, Ljajic; Icardi.
>
FORM – After the good performance of Napoli in the Coppa Italia, Mancini confirmed the 4- 2-3-1 , but changing a spokesman before. There’s Jovetic (decided with goals and assists against the Neapolitans), but Palacio. The idea is the same: create play through the game on the wings, where Montoya crops up.
FIRST TIME – The Inter tactic is clear: the team shows aggressive on the wings and offensive right away, going in search of the advantage. On the left down constantly Telles, Ljajic and Palacio, while Perisic swings from left to right, where the only Montoya makes both phases. Inter attacks, but the Carpi is dangerous on the break with Mbakogu, which gives considerable problems for the couple-Murillo Juan Jesus. The poker Inter offensive has freedom of action: Ljajic is focused, Perisic spreads most often to the left, allowing Palacio to act at the right hand of Icardi, which is more foreign to maneuver. Despite the siege Inter, the team of Beavers in the counterattack might even take the lead, because Inter’s defense dances a bit ‘too much and does not find the right countermeasures . Inter Mancini is as always chameleon : Melo and Brozovic interchange continuously to better cover the field and set the action. 40 ‘Inter attacks finally reaping the benefits: marks Palacio , which leads to empty it right, although its merit is to be in the right place at the right time. The first half ended 1-0 : too little to be safe, the Carpi sowing terror on the break.
SECOND TIME – In the second half Inter takes the field with a new tactic is not insignificant. In the interval, in fact, Mancini makes the first change: out Telles, in Miranda . Change interpreters, change the module: it goes to the 3-4-3 , where the position of Ljajic serves as variable. The Serbs, in fact, varies from the median ( 3-5-2 ) to the trocar ( 3-4-1-2 ), often spreading to the left. In the three defense Miranda went to the center between Murillo and Juan Jesus, while in midfield the external Montoya right and Perisic left. And it is the Croatian going to shoot from distance, but Belec denied him the joy of scoring: good to see that Inter will try from outside, negative in that area do not reach playable balls . Inter now expands his play: not only on the wings, but also for the central streets and the distance tries even Melo, which is the only element of connection between defense and midfield. The Brazilian star of a game clean: good closures, ordered enough also in the management of football, but it is too little for a team that has to change its step in the control room. The errors Inter are noticed especially in great (accurate) and the choice to beat the short corner : matches are also lost from these details, amazing note to every game this type of problem. Ball on the ground, instead, you see some good things done by the team when you try to play a simple, but too many errors are blatant inaccuracy of the individual players, they are defenders (Juan Jesus does not give many guarantees returning to its role ” mazzarriano “), external (Montoya drops and no one guesses more than one), midfielders (Brozovic not so on) or attacking (Icardi total stranger). Mancini runs for cover with the second change to the 76 ‘: out Montoya, Nagatomo inside . It tries to reform the back four, which features a version Juan Jesus “Maicon”, but it is only an illusion: Inter back soon to defend three, doing a lot of confusion. While looking for the 2-0, the Inter Belec turns in his idol Handanovic and first para of Palacio Melo then on, both sure to place it: the lack of cynicism weighs. 82 ‘madness Carpi: Pasciuti expelled for double yellow, avoidable. Then at 83 ‘Mancini makes the third and last change: out Palacio, in Jovetic . Mancini plays the last stage of the match in numerical superiority, testing the pair-Icardi Jovetic, but it is precisely the Argentine to waste 2-0 on idea Perisic. Wrong goals, goals at once: 92 ‘ marks Lasagna , which uses a resounding defensive hole where is everyone at Inter to sleep . Nothing to do for Handanovic nor Juan Jesus, which closes late after a long diagonal defensive. Although Inter is poured into attack with the 3-4-1-2 (see picture attached below, ed ), the 2-1 does not arrive . The match ends 1-1 : even out there is, but not so, after going to benefit both networks as well as men in the field.
THE STAR – A match drawn in this way is comparable to a defeat, but if you are wrong in most of the performers, something is not right on top of the team. Needless to blame the individual – which are still guilty – therefore, the attention goes to the guide: Roberto Mancini . The coach Jesi proves once again reversible or 1. up well before the game, fielding a formation is interesting considering the opponent today ( Carpi) is to tomorrow (Juventus in the Tim Cup and AC Milan in Serie A), and it is right in the choice of Palacio , who was to win the game; 2. then the same game is read bad, very bad, from the first change (the distrusted Miranda instead dell’ammonito Telles) and ending with the last (the exhausted Palacio for fresh Jovetic) . In short, the question of substitutions made evil again. A game already won was almost lost in a few moves, then punticino Inter-Carpi can not be taken with the smile on the lips .
COMMENT – Going into detail on tactical issues, I would like to focus on some contradictions highlighted during Inter-Carpi, always pointing out that the mistake on the goal of Lasagna is ridiculous: Juan Jesus is left alone to close a diagonal from left (his portion of the field) to the right (where did the shot of Lasagna) without Nagatomo, Murillo and Miranda intervene before the ball reaches the player Carpi (and the blame can be also the lack of filter in the middle of the field, of course). I try to list five points which puzzle me: 1. Mancini warned not to surrender one ‘- especially Miranda , because those of Medel and Kondogbia benches were announced for other reasons -, but then he inserts the Brazilian central range; 2. Mancini waiver Guarin – output – but the door on the bench the other runner, Frog , because behind the deck is short … Ranocchia but does not play even by mistake, it just meets Miranda; 3. Mancini replaces before left-back (Telles), then the right (Montoya) by inserting the multi Nagatomo , when in fact the only thing he needed Inter was clarity in the roles. Better a pure defender to defend the result or a midfielder to do in the middle density ( Gnoukouri has warmed vacuum) rather than a wild difficult to place tactical game going , such as Japanese; 4. Mancini uses the last change to remove a second striker (Palacio) … and enter a second striker (Jovetic), to close the game. But how? The Carpi was just ten, Inter lost quality and clarity both on the wings both forward because in the middle of the field there is nothing cosmic, the defense is not clear whether defends three or four … and he puts attack? Among other things without changing anything, be because of players like to work required (other than it would be by entering the sprinter Biabiany or Manaj , a lot closer to Icardi as animal d ‘ penalty area). 5. Mancini, after the goal of Carpi arrived at 92 ‘, knows that Inter does not have more time to recover, and complains with all – rightly so, because the ‘error of the team from the League PRO – and everything. But before thinking better manage the game? Look for the second goal by exploiting the shots to the flag? Make other changes? In short, the faults are common, but this time, Mancini is not absolutely free, you have to be honest. Mistakes which, I repeat, in my view are reading the game, not preparation. That’s why the point of Inter-Carpi, in fact, dropped two points: Mancini has prepared a great game that has won (1-0), leading to the locker room three points (the first time), but he read it just as badly and he lost (0-1), taking home a single point (the second half) . It’s a lesson.
->
No comments:
Post a Comment